Pressure builds to name privacy-law offenders

Pressure builds to name privacy-law offenders

Up to now, one of the loudest advocates of having the Privacy Commissioner "name names" has been Michael Geist (see Geist: Revise privacy law to expose offenders, block snoops, Article: Weak enforcement undermines privacy laws). Two additional voices have been added to the chorus, according to this article in the The Toronto Star:

TheStar.com - Pressure builds to name privacy-law offenders:

"Canadians had high expectations of a new privacy act that came into force on Jan. 1, 2004, designed to safeguard personal information in the private sector.

But the high hopes have not been fulfilled, according to two recent critical reports.

The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) "has not been kind to consumers," says the Public Interest Advocacy Centre.

...

People who bring a complaint to the privacy commissioner are free to make the full findings public.

But few do.

...

Similar arguments are made by Chris Berzins, a lawyer with the Ontario labour ministry, in an article published in the Canadian Journal of Law and Technology.

"The all but categorical refusal to reveal the names of complaint respondents," he says, "has a number of unfortunate results."

  • It greatly undercuts the instructive value that complaint investigations might have.

  • It deprives companies of the recognition they deserve when they comply with the law.

  • It unjustly rewards companies that flout the law.

  • It penalizes consumers who are unable to make informed privacy decisions.

  • It prevents the market from rewarding or penalizing companies based on the public's awareness of privacy practices.

  • It makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the commissioner's office in promoting compliance.


..."



I am of two minds on this issue. I have acted for a number of companies that have been complained about. In most cases, the matters complained about are relatively minor and the situation that gave rise to the complaints were inadvertent mistakes. In at least one case, they resolved the matter long before complaint ever went to the Commissioner, leaving us scratching our heads as to why they decided to proceed in that manner. It would be unfair to penalize companies acting in good faith that make an honest mistake, fix it and move on. But in cases where the consequences of the violation is significant or was a result of not being concerned about customer privacy, naming names may provide a wake-up call.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

  • Health Care Reform Explained from B... Dan Roam at the Back of the Napkin Blog sums up the current health care reform effort in this four part health care series, Healthcare Napkins All. Great back of the...
  • Why We Need A Health Care Revolutio... Dr. Val Jones' road to revolution provides her personal perspective on the current state of our health care system and why we all need to work for change.Don't miss the...
  • The important lesson from sandcastl... As I return to West Virginia after a week spent at the beach -- this post by Jim Carrol, Futurist, Trends & Innovation Expert, caught my attention. Much of my week on...
  • A little Nick: I'm a liberal an... Law blogger posts online: Don't miss reading this post by my favorite hospital blogging CEO, Nick Jacobs over at Nick's Blog. Much of what Nick has to say strikes a chord with me and this post is...
  • Executive Order Impacts Health Care... Law blogger posts online: President Bush signed an Executive Order on August 22 requiring federal agencies to do more to inform public health care consumers about the cost and quality of health...
  • eHealthWV: West Virginia EHR Public... Law blogger posts online: As a part of West Virginia's participation in the Health Information Security and Privacy Collaborative (HISPC), West Virginia Medical Institute and its partners launch...
  • Physicians vs. Patient: Rating-Perm... Interesting post from the WSJ Health Blog on Medical Justice's new ratings-permission contracts (press release on service).This new service offered by Medical Justice...
  • Just when you thought it was safe: ... Law blogger posts online: I’ve blogged previously about just how much I hate browser toolbars and nothing much has changed in the four years that have passed. Call me nosey, but when I’m...
  • Governor Manchin Approves Cardiac C...The West Virginia Health Care Authority website indicates today that Governor Manchin approved the final revised certificate of need Cardiac Catheterization Standards.
  • A Law Actually Interview with… Litt... Next up in the interview chair is Gemma from Little Tiny Pieces. Little Tiny Pieces is an interesting name?  What it inspired it; does it have any hidden meanings?...
  • Let the voting commence!... Law blogger posts online: Yes, after two long weeks of nominations, the shortlist for the 2010 Blawggies has been decided and voting for the awards can officially begin! The polls will remain...
  • Is blogging good for your health?... Law blogger posts online: Is blogging good for your health?This Boston Globe article, Cancer blogs become part of treatment, indicates that blogging about your condition has a positive impact.The...
  • ADVANCE Magazine - Article on EHRs ... Recently I was interviewed for an article looking at the legal issues involved in the developing world of EHRs and PHRs written by Beth Walsh for ADVANCE Magazine. The...