The False Claims Act: Recent Changes Affecting Health Care Entities

The False Claims Act: Recent Changes Affecting Health Care Entities

Amy Rothman, an attorney in the health care practice group at our firm recently authored an article on the False Claims Act and recent changes brought on by the Deficit Deduction Act of 2005 and West Virginia's fraud and abuse statute that will appear in the Spring 2007 edition of the Defense Trial Counsel of West Virginia Newsletter. Congratulations to Amy on a great article.

The article is titled, The False Claims Act: Recent Changes Affecting Health Care Entities

The False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., was enacted in 1863 during the presidency of Abraham Lincoln. The FCA, also known as the Lincoln Law, was established to prevent pricing fraud by persons and companies selling supplies to the Union Army during the Civil War. The original FCA contained a qui tam provision that allowed citizens, on behalf of the United States, to sue companies or individuals for false or fraudulent billings submitted to the government. The current version of the FCA still allows for qui tam actions for false or fraudulent claims. While the FCA applies to any false claim submitted to the United States government, the FCA has been actively used as a tool for combating Medicare and Medicaid billing fraud. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) reports that Medicare and Medicaid spending was over $500 billion for the 2006 fiscal year. In CMS’ 2006 Management’s Discussion and Analysis, administrators at CMS recognized that the best way to cut Medicare and Medicaid spending and maintain the integrity of the programs was to reduce Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse. For example, the Department of Health and Human Services reports that it collected almost $2.3 billion in 2006 from false claims suits. By implementing and actively enforcing anti-fraud compliance laws, the government can recover more money and, thus, curb the amount of Medicare and Medicaid spending.

In order to further combat health care fraud and abuse, Congress enacted the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (“DRA”), P.L. 109-171. The DRA contains provisions to slow mandatory spending in Medicare and Medicaid. Furthermore, the DRA includes a provision, § 6032, that requires health care entities to address fraud and false claims within the Medicaid system. Section 6032, entitled “Employee Education About False Claims Recovery,” requires entities receiving or making payments of more than $5 million annually in Medicaid reimbursement to establish policies and disseminate information to employees about the False Claims Act and anti-fraud compliance. Notably, the DRA does not contain a similar provision requiring entities to address fraud within the Medicare system.

On December 13, 2006, CMS issued a letter to provide guidance to state Medicaid programs and health care entities on compliance with § 6032. According to CMS, § 6032 applies to any health care entity making or receiving $5 million in Medicare payments, regardless of whether the entity is for-profit or not-for-profit, whether the payments are made at a single location or multiple locations, or whether the payments are made under multiple tax identification numbers. Entities subject to § 6032 must establish policies for all employees, including management, contractors, and agents, regarding false claims and fraud and abuse. Those policies must include detailed information about the federal FCA and any applicable state FCA, as well as the entity’s policies for detecting fraud, waste, and abuse. The entity must also provide information to employees regarding the right of an employee to be protected as a whistleblower in a qui tam action.

According to § 6032, the entity must include this information in its employee handbook. CMS indicates that an entity that does not have an employee handbook is under no obligation to create one. However, CMS does indicate that it is the entity’s responsibility to disseminate the written policies.

All health care entities subject to § 6032 were required to comply with the provisions of § 6032 by January 1, 2007. The penalty for non-compliance is high—health care providers can be excluded from participation in the Medicaid program. In addition, failure to establish and distribute false claims policies could result in false claims exposure. Furthermore, if a false claim action is brought against an entity and the entity is found liable, the entity may have to pay treble damages to the government.

Currently, West Virginia does not have a false claims act governing all governmental transactions. However, West Virginia does have a statute that regulates fraud and abuse in the Medicaid program, West Virginia Code § 9-7-1 et seq. Section 9-7-1 indicates that the purpose of West Virginia’s fraud and abuse statute is to combat the substantial sums of money that have been lost by the state and federal government in operation of the state’s Medicaid program.

West Virginia’s fraud and abuse statute states that “[a] person shall not make or present or cause to be made or presented to the [Department of Health and Human Resources] a claim under the medical programs of the department of welfare knowing the claim to be false, fraudulent or fictitious.” W. Va. Code § 9-7-5(b) (1981). The statute provides for both civil and criminal penalties. In addition, any person or entity that violates the statute is liable to the Department of Health and Human Resources for fines equal to three times the amount of any payments received from which that person or entity was not entitled. W. Va. Code § 9-7-6 (1981).

If history is any indication, West Virginia also may enact false claims provisions that mimic the federal law. The DRA provides an incentive to states that establish false claims statutes. Under the incentive, states with false claims statutes will receive an additional 10% of any funds recovered under that statute. Because of this incentive, it is likely that West Virginia will update its fraud and abuse statute.

In the future, it is likely that all entities, whether receiving more or less than $5 million in Medicaid payments, will be required to comply with § 6032’s false claims and anti-fraud policies. Additionally, if § 6032 helps curtail Medicaid spending, fraud, and abuse, it is plausible that Congress will enact similar policies for the Medicare program. Due to the DRA’s employee education requirements and state incentive to create false claims acts, the future holds a strong likelihood of increased false claims investigation and litigation.

Amy L. Rothman is a health care litigation attorney at Flaherty, Sensabaugh & Bonasso, PLLC. For questions, she can be reached at (304) 345-0200.

UPDATE: On March 20, 2007, CMS issued DRA 6032 - Employer Education About False Claims Recovery - Frequently Asked Questions an additional guidance document on interpretation of the new regulations. Additional guidance materials can be found under the State Medicaid Directors Letters section of the CMS website under Final Guidance Regarding Employee Education for False Claims Recovery.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

  • Health Care Reform Explained from B... Dan Roam at the Back of the Napkin Blog sums up the current health care reform effort in this four part health care series, Healthcare Napkins All. Great back of the...
  • Why We Need A Health Care Revolutio... Dr. Val Jones' road to revolution provides her personal perspective on the current state of our health care system and why we all need to work for change.Don't miss the...
  • The important lesson from sandcastl... As I return to West Virginia after a week spent at the beach -- this post by Jim Carrol, Futurist, Trends & Innovation Expert, caught my attention. Much of my week on...
  • A little Nick: I'm a liberal an... Law blogger posts online: Don't miss reading this post by my favorite hospital blogging CEO, Nick Jacobs over at Nick's Blog. Much of what Nick has to say strikes a chord with me and this post is...
  • Executive Order Impacts Health Care... Law blogger posts online: President Bush signed an Executive Order on August 22 requiring federal agencies to do more to inform public health care consumers about the cost and quality of health...
  • eHealthWV: West Virginia EHR Public... Law blogger posts online: As a part of West Virginia's participation in the Health Information Security and Privacy Collaborative (HISPC), West Virginia Medical Institute and its partners launch...
  • Physicians vs. Patient: Rating-Perm... Interesting post from the WSJ Health Blog on Medical Justice's new ratings-permission contracts (press release on service).This new service offered by Medical Justice...
  • Just when you thought it was safe: ... Law blogger posts online: I’ve blogged previously about just how much I hate browser toolbars and nothing much has changed in the four years that have passed. Call me nosey, but when I’m...
  • Governor Manchin Approves Cardiac C...The West Virginia Health Care Authority website indicates today that Governor Manchin approved the final revised certificate of need Cardiac Catheterization Standards.
  • A Law Actually Interview with… Litt... Next up in the interview chair is Gemma from Little Tiny Pieces. Little Tiny Pieces is an interesting name?  What it inspired it; does it have any hidden meanings?...
  • Let the voting commence!... Law blogger posts online: Yes, after two long weeks of nominations, the shortlist for the 2010 Blawggies has been decided and voting for the awards can officially begin! The polls will remain...
  • Is blogging good for your health?... Law blogger posts online: Is blogging good for your health?This Boston Globe article, Cancer blogs become part of treatment, indicates that blogging about your condition has a positive impact.The...
  • ADVANCE Magazine - Article on EHRs ... Recently I was interviewed for an article looking at the legal issues involved in the developing world of EHRs and PHRs written by Beth Walsh for ADVANCE Magazine. The...